I don't, but Lincoln Moura, the. New President is a frien and i will ask him to introduce me.
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:49 PM, "Evelyn Hovenga" <ehovenga at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone know either of these Co-Chairs personally ? > Dominik Aronsky (Switzerland, Co-?Chair) > Tze??Yun Leong (Singapore, Co-?Chair) > > If yes than please have a friendly discussion to see if this decision can be > reversed. > > Evelyn > > <image001.jpg> > Prof Evelyn J.S.Hovenga, CEO, Director & Trainer > eHealth Education Pty Ltd, RTO 32279 > (trading as RSC Training and eHE Training) > > : PO Box 9783, Frenchville Qld 4701 > * e.hovenga at ehe.edu.au > ? 0408309839 > ' 1300 285 512 > 8 www.ehe.edu.au > 8 www.ehetraining.com.au > > . > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Koray Atalag > Sent: Friday, 22 March 2013 11:09 AM > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > I suggest contacting the chair of SPC in person again and have a friendly > discussion by giving all specifics. I?ve had positive results in past. > If not let?s protest it by not attending and they?ll never dare to do that > again! That?s just one good example of how peer review processes can be > flawed. I don?t think there is any bad intentions but just natural > limitations of time and human resource. These should all be crowd-sourced. > > Cheers, > > -koray > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Jussara > Sent: Sunday, 17 March 2013 8:00 p.m. > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions > Subject: Re: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > I was about to suggest that, but as one of the authors I think a letter from > me could be taken by them as a defense of personal intererests, could we do > it collectively, like an Avaaz petition? if we gather some signatures and > send is as a group it could be effective, what do you think? > > > Enviado via iPad > > Em Mar 17, 2013, ?s 1:35 AM, "Heather Leslie" <heather.leslie at > oceaninformatics.com> escreveua: > > Following on from Silje, Jussara and John?s recent emails, I wonder if > members of the community were to contact the scientific committee and request > that the decision not to run the workshop be reconsidered? > > Would that influence their decision? > > Anyone interested? Or am I totally mad? J > > Cheers > > Heather > > P.S. spc at medinfo2013.dk J > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of John Hughes > Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 11:21 PM > To: 'For openEHR clinical discussions' > Subject: RE: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > The ascendance of clinical modeling on the international informatics agenda > should be supported. The ground work done by the openEHR Foundation has shown > prescient leadership. I will attend any tutorial or presentation related to > this at MedInfo 2013. The last session at the Cape Town MedInfo helped spawn > a national initiative to achieve clinical information and process standards > for the eMR domain in Canada. > > Best to all > Willing to help > > jh > > John B. Hughes M.D., C.M. > Assistant Professor > McGill University > Faculty of Medicine > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Jussara macedo > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:00 AM > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Subject: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > Last year I attended a Congress in Argentina which pogram was organized > according the preferences of the potential attendees gathered months before > through a social network. Verey web 2.0, very openEHR. e also had > difficulties in approving panels and workshop related to this theme before in > our national congresses, we?re never in the main room, but this year our > workshop was by far the most attended. Lots of young clinicians, Y > generation, many of them working on mhealth startups, ipad EHRs,clinical > decision support systems, health social networks and other health 2.0 > initiatives, all of them knowing exactly the value of the bloody data. Times > are a changing, and fast. Scientific committees os Informatics Congresses > also have to enter the 2.0 era and interact more timely with the audience. > I?m sure our workshop would be a blast and would attract a new audience to > the congress, which is this new generation. They are not informaticians, they > are naturals.... > Jussara R?tzsch > Owner, Giant Global Graph ehealth Solutions > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Bakke, Silje Ljosland <silje.ljosland.bakke > at helse-bergen.no> wrote: > I hope you succeed! I was planning on going to Medinfo if this workshop was > accepted. J > > Kind regards, > Silje Ljosland Bakke > E-health adviser > 40203298 > Haukeland University Hospital > www.helse-bergen.no > > > Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > P? vegne av Ian McNicoll > Sendt: 14. mars 2013 11:42 > Til: For openEHR clinical discussions > Emne: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > Thanks Heather, > > Worth a try :-) > > Ian > > > On 14 March 2013 03:17, Heather Leslie <heather.leslie at > oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > Let?s see if they?ll reconsider. Worth a try! > > H > > From: Heather Leslie [mailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com] > Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 2:17 PM > To: 'spc at medinfo2013.dk' > Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > Given that our submission was rejected on the grounds that it was more suited > for a different format and not for lack of merit, is it possible for this to > be reconsidered as a tutorial? > > This approach that we wish to share is gaining significant international > traction and in all other conferences attracts significant interest. In fact, > at MIE in Sweden our workshop on openEHR was the only one to achieve > sufficient registrants to actually run. > > I would respectfully ask your committee to reconsider our proposal, > specifically because of the reviewers comments re needing a different format, > not that the proposal was not of use or interest. I also note the reviewers > specifically point out the strengths of the proposal coming from a panel of > very experienced implementers and a clear educational purpose. > > Many thanks for your reconsideration, > > Regards > > Heather Leslie > > Dr Heather Leslie > MBBS FRACGP FACHI > Director of Clinical Modelling > Ocean Informatics > Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670 > Skype - heatherleslie > Twitter - @omowizard > > From: Medinfo2013 [mailto:mailrobot at online-registry.net] > Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 3:05 AM > To: heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com > Subject: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 > > Medinfo 2013 > > > MEDINFO 2013 - Decision on Submission ID MEDINFO-946 > > 12th March 2013 > > > Dear Dr. Heather Leslie, > > Thank you for submitting your contribution entitled The international impact > of openEHR clinical content models (Id=946) to MEDINFO 2013, the 14th World > Congress on Medical and Health Informatics to be held from August 20-23 2013 > at the Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. > > Medinfo 2013 received a very large number of submissions, with more than 500 > papers and more than 200 posters. All submitted papers were reviewed by a > minimum of two reviewers and members of the Scientific Program Committee > (SPC). All submitted posters, workshops, panels, and scientific > demonstrations were reviewed by members of the SPC. Given the constraints of > the limited meeting length and space, and the high quality of the > submissions, the SPC was forced to make some difficult decisions this year. > > Unfortunately, your submission was not accepted for the conference program. > We appreciated your submission; comments from the reviewers are listed below > and we hope that they are informative and helpful. > > MEDINFO 2013 Decision: Not Accepted > > We hope that you can still join the international biomedical informatics > community at MEDINFO in Copenhagen. The early bird deadline is April 15, > 2013. You can register and get additional information about the conference > program, tutorial, on-site program, etc. at: www.medinfo2013.dk > > > Warm Regards > > Dominik Aronsky & Tze-Yun Leong, SPC Co-chairs > > > Reviewers' Comments > > This proposal is more suitable for a tutorial. The authors do not clearly > describe audience engagement strategies.THe strengths come from a panel of > experimented implementers of openEHR archetypes and a clear educational > purpose, but it lacks methodology to encourage attendees to interact with the > presenters. > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > > > > -- > Dr Ian McNicoll > office +44 (0)1536 414 994 > fax +44 (0)1536 516317 > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > skype ianmcnicoll > ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com > > Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK > Director openEHR Foundation www.openehr.org/knowledge > Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland > BCS Primary Health Care www.phcsg.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130322/bc1207fd/attachment-0001.html>
