well the problem with continuing to use ADL 1.4 is the in a) weaknesses
modelling semantics (much weaker in 1.4) b) errors caused by lack of
differential representation of specialised archetypes (a major problem)
and c) different representation of templates (in ADL2 they are built-in).
Implementations can standardise on OPT 1.4 without difficulty for some
time, but this doesn't require continued use of ADL 1.4 for modelling.
- thomas
On 01/03/2017 12:54, Ian McNicoll wrote:
Hi Thomas / Bert,
I think you will find a significant pain point in the modelling
community. Agree that for now 1.4 .opt is going to be best for
implementers but as I understand things a 2.0 .opt and related RM
changes would not be radically different, in any case.
The big difference, and gain (once we get over the line) is much
easier handling of design-time artefacts, and potential extensibility.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
