Good news Thomas, but don't bring it with disdain.
Op 1-3-2017 om 10:15 schreef Thomas Beale:
which when they are read into ADL Workbench, are re-engineered into
differential form
I think the ADL Workbench is a cryptic piece of software which could use
some GUI-specialists to redesign it, so it will become understandable
for non-software-specialists.
Using this technology is just a case of moving to ADL/AOM2.
I wouldn't call it "just a case", ADL2 is not yet fully defined.
See the open cases in the specifications (128):
https://openehr.atlassian.net/projects/SPECPR/issues/SPECPR-168?filter=allopenissues
The tooling is not yet ready, and even when there will be a frozen
standard, it will take years for institutions to migrate. They want a
stable version, before shifting their core-information to a new
information-structure.
It is good news, but don't bring it as it is like a breathe, then you
disregard the hard work of people working on the technical information
side of institutions.
Sorry to be harsh on this, but so was your reply,
Best regards
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
