I too run a vm based fax server and haven't had any problems but then it's very low use too.
Anything special to take into considering when buildin OM onto a virtual machine? I ask because the thread mentioned a virtual appliance being available but I'm not clear on the benefits over just building it myself. Thanks. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM, shawn wilson <ag4ve...@gmail.com> wrote: > Asterisk used to have these issues with reviving faxes. I've heard this is > resolved in recent versions. > > That said, I haven't really noticed any issues with voice in voip vm > systems. There might be sync issues if you record a meeting on a vm - don't > know. > > I pay for a vps from a company that runs kvm though I haven't gotten into > most of the features. > On Jun 20, 2011 10:14 AM, "Mike" <cais...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't rent, I own the infrastructure so can dedicate hardware. Most of > my > > blades are minimum dual duo-core 2.4 and up with 8 to 16GB of memory. > Based > > on what you mention below, sounds like I have plenty of power. > > > > The problem is that even in testing sip servers for example, we've come > > across plenty of timing issues where the clock would skew and become a > > problem so have since avoided anything which is real time such as sip or > > audio/video. > > > > This is why I thought it was interesting when I saw this thread as I most > > definitely like to use VM's when possible because of the benefits in > > maintenance. > > > > Sounds like you don't have any concerns using OM on VM's so I think I'll > > give it a try. I tend not to overburden blades when doing this because > > hardware is cheap, complaints aren't. > > > > Thanks for the input. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:53 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Mike, > >> > >> performance hardly depends on VM VS dedicated server. It is just often > the > >> case that people rent a cheap VM for 20 Euros /Bugs and then find out > that > >> they have no SWAP space, not enough memory et cetera and no chance in > >> changing that with their cheap VM package as they have no control about > the > >> Server that hosts all the VMs and manages the HW resources. > >> > >> If you have a scenario where you actually have the full control about > the > >> VMs, virtualization has the same pro's and cons like with any other > >> application and you can calc the IO or number of simultaneous users same > >> like on a dedicated server. > >> > >> Absolute numbers depend on the use-case. > >> Around 500-1000 simultaneous users for 4GB RAM, 3 GHz CPU. > >> > >> Sebastian > >> > >> > >> 2011/6/20 Mike <cais...@gmail.com> > >> > >>> Can this actually be done on a vm? I've been using a dedicated server > >>> because people used to say it wasn't worth doing on vm because of the > >>> realtime requirements. Assuming beefy enough hardware and resources to > the > >>> vm, what could one expect in terms of simultaneous users? Anyone have > any > >>> input based on their own usage. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sebastian Wagner < > seba.wag...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thanks Diogo, > >>>> > >>>> I have slightly modified the wiki/installation with the links: > >>>> > >>>> > http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/InstallationOpenMeetings#VMWare > >>>> > >>>> Sebastian > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>>> "OpenMeetings User" group. > >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openmeetings-user/-/iLyO0_5x604J. > >>>> > >>>> To post to this group, send email to > openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en. > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>> "OpenMeetings User" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to > openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sebastian Wagner > >> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com > >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "OpenMeetings User" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com > . > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en. > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OpenMeetings User" group. > > To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OpenMeetings User" group. > To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenMeetings User" group. To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en.
