I don't see any reason why we cannot use this... +// THIS CODE AND INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY +// KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE +// IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND/OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR +// PURPOSE.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Kalev Lember <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/12/2009 09:45 AM, François Leblanc wrote: > >> * we need to check copyright situation with the cardmod.h file and maybe > >> you used some template or similar for the ccm? then we need to give > >> proper reference etc. a few other files need a copyright header too. > >> > > > > Yes absolutely. The "cardmod.h" copyright need some attention. For opensccm > > prototypes come from the cardmod.h. > > "cardmod.h" is part of Microsoft CNG SDK [1]. I suppose instead of > redistributing the header, it would be better to require that the CNG > SDK msi is installed at the build machines. I haven't investigated the > header's copyright, but I doubt it has a free license. However, removing > the header also has a drawback: it makes cross compiling with mingw harder. > > [1] > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1EF399E9-B018-49DB-A98B-0CED7CB8FF6F&displaylang=en > > -- > Kalev Lember > _______________________________________________ > opensc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
