John Plocher <John.Plocher at Sun.COM> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > "Garrett D'Amore" <gdamore at sun.com> wrote:
> >> No, not really. If you want to create a new portability layer, then
> >> please propose a new case. This case is about the rmt and star
> >> application programs, and the supporting librmt.
> >
> > This is not a new portability layer. It is in use since more than 15 years.
>
> Repeat after me: "It is a new portability layer for OpenSolaris".
> It is also NOT THIS CASE.
I am sorry to see that you are not interested in a fruitful discussion.
Could you please stay out of this discussion unless you are willing to
contribute?
Repeat after me: "If /usr/include/schily/ is unacceptable in OpenSolaris I
will first need to remove /usr/include/ast".
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
