Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
> > Repeat after me: "If /usr/include/schily/ is unacceptable in OpenSolaris I
> > will first need to remove /usr/include/ast".
>
> John was actually trying to HELP star get integrated by suggesting that
> the issue of the include files be dealt with in another case where an
> appropriate discussion can be had.
If he tried to help, he is a master in hiding this fact ;-)
> A later case that presents either parts of the Schily system or the
> whole thing is the best place to have the discussion. In my opinion
> ast and plenty of other things already set sufficient precedence but I'd
> like to see a case (or cases) that deals with the library interfaces
> separately from a case (this one) that deals with the admin usable CLI
> of star. That is what John means two when he says "NOT THIS CASE".
>
> We can get star integrated via this case or we can have a big long
> discussion about stuff that wasn't part of this case material. Which
> would you prefer we do now ?
Future cases can be discussed much easier if the intention of a reply
is clearly visible.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
