>Repeat after me.... > > ast may or may not be appropriate. If it isn't, we blew it, but the >ARCs don't allow "double > jeprody"[1]. The existence of ast in Solaris is unrelated to star >(and associated). > >- jek3 > >[1] I don't know if Germany has the concept of "double jeprody". It >is that once you have been > acquitted by a court of an infraction, you can't be tried again. >(The ARC modifies this in that one > can alter a decision based on significant new information and >agreement of the CTO (or > equivalent). Its happened only a few times.
I think you may mean "double jeopardy" although you spelled it consistently. The equivalent in some European countries would be "ne bis in idem" (Latin loosely meaning "not twice for the same") Casper
