Hmm....
I wonder if we have a cultural disconnect here.
When I see or hear a lot of Joerg's messages, they seem to come off
brusque and harsh to me. Other people who, to my view, seem to be
trying to be helpful, are blamed by Joerg as being "impolite".
And I now wonder if some of my messages, have been viewed as "hindering"
or "impolite", when I certainly didn't mean them as such.
If there is a cultural disconnect, then maybe by being aware of it, we
can eliminate some of the ill sentiment that I think may be growing here
unintentionally.
For one, let me say that I'm interested in helping achieve convergence,
but I'm also not prepared to go hunting around in materials that are not
part of the case materials, and nor am I willing to approve architecture
based on unrelated precedent. I am willing to accept that a project may
be split into multiple phases, and I'm happy to review something like
/usr/include/schily when the materials for such are presented before ARC.
So, in the meantime, can we assume that there is no ill will (none
exists on my part, for sure), and move ahead without inferring personal
attacks are intended, and without making any. Lets stay focused on the
technology, okay?
-- Garrett
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
>
>
>>> People who try to help usually do not use a harsh tone.....
>>>
>> In PSARC language "NOT THIS CASE" is like a lawyer shouting "OBJECTION"
>> in court. "OBJECTION" I find quite harsh in normal day to day English.
>>
>
> Starting a text with a patronizing phrase is not what I would call polite
> habbit. If I see something like this, I stop reading. If he likes other
> people
> to read his text, he would need to learn a better conversational tone.
>
>
> J?rg
>
>
