On 02/25/10 01:59 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote: > On 02/25/10 01:32 PM, John Fischer wrote: >> Darren, >> >> So if I am following you correctly.... You are saying that the >> underlying architecture is flawed thus the current proposal (which >> assumes that the underlying architecture is correct) is also flawed. >> Is there a bug (RFE or defect) filed against the architectural >> issue? > > Indeed there is: > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4885 > > I believe the install team acknowledges that this is a problem and have > stated that this will be fixed (perhaps Dave Miner can confirm). As > such, I would agree with Darren that this case seems to be going astray > of the overall direction of the install architecture. >
The intention is to fix the bug. I would suggest that the case be amended to reflect that Primary Administrator will not be configured. Dave
