All, Having the required +1, modifying the proposal to reflect the dependency on 2010/069 and having reached the new timer I have marked this case closed approved.
Thanks, John On 03/ 3/10 01:54 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote: > On 03/ 3/10 04:54 PM, Matt Keenan wrote: >> I agree with making this case dependent on 2010/067, once it has been >> reviewed/approved we can implement the required resolution within the >> install space if necessary. > > Great, +1 on the case given the original proposal with an amendment to > have it depend on 2010/067. > > -Seb
