On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:20:20 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > On 03/22/10 10:03 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> Darren Reed wrote: >> >>> What the default path, in /etc/default and elsewhere, really >>> impact are things like: >>> - install scripts (that don't use ~/.foo) >>> - how scripts run remotely when ~/.foo isn't read >>> - at/cron jobs >>> - other uses of $SHELL where ~/.foo isn't read >>> >> And notably, that path hasn't changed. The /usr/gnu/bin change >> was only in the default .profile installed in new user accounts. >> >> > This has its own problems... having the GNU path be used by new users, > is going to cause problems when those same users get a totally different > set of tools when they issue cronjobs or at jobs. > > I've commented in PSARC 2010/067. Lets take the discussion there please. > > - Garrett
Garrett, I'm not sure if you intend it this way or not, but what is coming across to some of us (who do not get paychecks from Oracle) is that you want us to shut up and go home. You want to move all discussion on a topic that affects most of us to the case log of a private case where we cannot participate. You have already said that 2010/067 covers several issues and that many of them "should" be open. Would it really be that much work for an internal ARC member to split 2010/067 into two parts and open the case that doesn't contain Oracle proprietary info? - Don