>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Yes, that seems to be to cumbersome; I would prefer OGB not to be >> involved in project creations as long as projects are started under >> the wings of a community and the community is not disfunctional > >In that case (if my reading of the OGB minutes is correct) Roland's ksh >project would never have got off the ground. > >I don't understand why a community is necessary for a project to exist, >sorry.
You're interpreting my words incorrectly. For those communities which are functioning, it seems strange to require their projects to be approved somehow. But something will have to create "non-community-endorsed" projects; are we just talking about those? Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
