[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The level of beaurocracy in OpenSolaris exceeds what I've seen
in any other open source group by an order of magnitude and
is a facet of life at Sun that we seem to have carried over from
Solaris to OpenSolaris, for better or worse.
I agree entirely, that mirrors my thoughts too.
Holy crap yes.
Yes, that seems to be to cumbersome; I would prefer OGB not to be
involved in project creations as long as projects are started under
the wings of a community and the community is not disfunctional
Certainly in this case where load of communities will likely to be
involved and most unlikely
these communities are active and well Certainly, the new 'Indiana'
project/communities
will be most active based on the discussions and enthusiasm shown forth
to date.
OGB is here to allow the flourishing of the OpenSolaris communities.
Processes can
be defined for a good intent, but it should be refined as things
developes, otherwise,
we ends up putting unnecessary blocks along the way, ...
Just my thoughts.
-Ghee
Casper
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
