On 2006.10.20 at 13:51:47 +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > Keep in mind that mingw defines _WIN32_WINNT=0x333, i.e. the intention > was to target all NT versions [note that 0x333 actually covers even for > Windows 9x, which has at least all 0x333 stubs, so that application can > actually start]. As for winsock versioning. Upon latest modifications to > b_sock.c I considered linking with wsock32 to be sufficient/appropriate > for following reason. Systems equipped with ws2_32.dll do have wsock32 > too, and this wsock32.dll is actually linked with ws2_32.dll. Meaning > that [legacy] application linked with wsock32 alone will actually bring > even ws2_32.dll into address space. Now note that b_sock.c makes > *global* lookups for getaddrinfo, meaning that application linked with
Hmm, actually -lws2_32 is not strictly neccessary. Are there tests for IPV6 in BIO in the test suite? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
