Thanks for the reply Gayathri.
Do you mean to changing the sockets to non blocking, or when i create bio
for ssl to make that as non blocking?

Thanks.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Gayathri Sundar <suraj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Harsh,
>
> Okay from what I can understand, if you make ur underlying fd non blocking
> then it would work fine. Blocking FDs, unless and until one client is
> finished with its processing the other client will not be able to
> communicate with the server as the previous fd is blocked. The server is
> waiting on the 1st client to finish. When you have 3 ports and 3 clients
> then ofcourse it will work.
>
> thanks
> --Gayathri
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Harshvir Sidhu <hvssi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gayatri,
>> My server code is single threaded and i am using blocking sockets, i am
>> using fd_set and select to wait for event on socket, and then performing
>> operation based on the event that acts on a socket.
>> I have an array of sockets to listen. So if i start listening on 3
>> different ports and from my client machien, i try to connect on them at
>> different ports then it works fine, but when i use 1 listen port then it
>> dont work properly. What i mean to say by work properly is that the
>> connection is established, but when i am waiting for select to return event,
>> then it dont show any activity when i send data from client, only 1 of them
>> works, 2 dont work.
>> In addition to that, when i use WireShark to see packets, then it shows
>> that machine has received the packet from client. But server dont show that
>> alert.
>> Thats why i think it could be some socket option which is affecting it.
>>
>> // Harshvir
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Gayathri Sundar <suraj...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Harshvir,
>>>
>>> SO_REUSEADDR sock option has noting to do with ur problem, please go thro
>>> the socket ops man page to get a better understanding. First find out if ur
>>> server code is a blocking i/o or non blocking I/O..if former then
>>> connections will be handled sequentially..only after the 1st client is
>>> finished will the server be able to respond to the 2nd connect request. If
>>> non blocking then there should be no problem. Check the code if you see and
>>> O_NONBLOCK flag set in some fcntl call or check for FIONBIO flag.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> --Gayathri
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Harshvir Sidhu <hvssi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well i think this link is for my question.
>>>> I have already done 1-5 from the Before you ask list.
>>>> Number 6, i dont know anyone who use openssl.
>>>> Number 7, it will take a lot of time to go through all the code, i was
>>>> just trying to save some time. I thought user discussion forums are for 
>>>> this
>>>> only. I apologize for my understanding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Farrell <jfarr...@pillardata.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* Harshvir Sidhu
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>    I have a server application, which accepts normal sockets and ssl
>>>>> socket connections. I am trying to make 3 connections to server from 1
>>>>> client machine, on same server port.
>>>>>    When i connect on normal sockets then it works with any number of
>>>>> connections.
>>>>>    When i tried to connect SSL then they dont work. If i connect 1
>>>>> client then it works.
>>>>>
>>>>>    In my listen socket, I have SO_REUSEADDR socket option, at first i
>>>>> thought might be this is causing issue, but i tried to use
>>>>> SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE even then it dont work.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Has someone seen some issue like this, any possible suggestion for
>>>>> this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> // Harshvir
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to