Thanks for the reply Gayathri. Do you mean to changing the sockets to non blocking, or when i create bio for ssl to make that as non blocking?
Thanks. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Gayathri Sundar <suraj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Harsh, > > Okay from what I can understand, if you make ur underlying fd non blocking > then it would work fine. Blocking FDs, unless and until one client is > finished with its processing the other client will not be able to > communicate with the server as the previous fd is blocked. The server is > waiting on the 1st client to finish. When you have 3 ports and 3 clients > then ofcourse it will work. > > thanks > --Gayathri > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Harshvir Sidhu <hvssi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Gayatri, >> My server code is single threaded and i am using blocking sockets, i am >> using fd_set and select to wait for event on socket, and then performing >> operation based on the event that acts on a socket. >> I have an array of sockets to listen. So if i start listening on 3 >> different ports and from my client machien, i try to connect on them at >> different ports then it works fine, but when i use 1 listen port then it >> dont work properly. What i mean to say by work properly is that the >> connection is established, but when i am waiting for select to return event, >> then it dont show any activity when i send data from client, only 1 of them >> works, 2 dont work. >> In addition to that, when i use WireShark to see packets, then it shows >> that machine has received the packet from client. But server dont show that >> alert. >> Thats why i think it could be some socket option which is affecting it. >> >> // Harshvir >> >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Gayathri Sundar <suraj...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Harshvir, >>> >>> SO_REUSEADDR sock option has noting to do with ur problem, please go thro >>> the socket ops man page to get a better understanding. First find out if ur >>> server code is a blocking i/o or non blocking I/O..if former then >>> connections will be handled sequentially..only after the 1st client is >>> finished will the server be able to respond to the 2nd connect request. If >>> non blocking then there should be no problem. Check the code if you see and >>> O_NONBLOCK flag set in some fcntl call or check for FIONBIO flag. >>> >>> Thanks >>> --Gayathri >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Harshvir Sidhu <hvssi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Well i think this link is for my question. >>>> I have already done 1-5 from the Before you ask list. >>>> Number 6, i dont know anyone who use openssl. >>>> Number 7, it will take a lot of time to go through all the code, i was >>>> just trying to save some time. I thought user discussion forums are for >>>> this >>>> only. I apologize for my understanding. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Farrell <jfarr...@pillardata.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Harshvir Sidhu >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have a server application, which accepts normal sockets and ssl >>>>> socket connections. I am trying to make 3 connections to server from 1 >>>>> client machine, on same server port. >>>>> When i connect on normal sockets then it works with any number of >>>>> connections. >>>>> When i tried to connect SSL then they dont work. If i connect 1 >>>>> client then it works. >>>>> >>>>> In my listen socket, I have SO_REUSEADDR socket option, at first i >>>>> thought might be this is causing issue, but i tried to use >>>>> SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE even then it dont work. >>>>> >>>>> Has someone seen some issue like this, any possible suggestion for >>>>> this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> // Harshvir >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
