On 2023-11-17, at 14:57, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: >>> I thought that we agreed that this justification for PS is not >>> accurate (1): "linktypes "highest" level is Specification Required". A >>> better reason should be provided. > >> The draft doesn’t just register in that registry, it creates a registry. > >> Note that I have tried multiple times to find out what the requirements >> on the document type/stream for creating a registry are, and I haven’t >> found anything. > > I was told by Adrien Farrel, then ISE, that the ISE couldn't create > registries that potentially required any kind of IETF actions to fill them. > Now, we've changed the IANA Considerations since then, but that's where we > were a few years ago.
OK, but these are IETF WG documents, not on the ISE stream. So I don’t think this information is relevant (if it were, we’d need to advance it from rumor level to some authoritative reference). Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
