Hi Henk,

It should come as no surprise that I would be happy to see this adopted.

I want to note that, as is always the case in the IETF, adoption would mean 
that the working group can change every word of the document and even decide to 
abandon the document. So Carlos and I are listening to all of the comments 
being made and trying to work out solutions. Obviously, some of the comments 
are asking for bigger changes than others so will need more discussion, and 
we'll need to bring the WG along as we search for consensus.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
Sent: 10 April 2024 12:06
To: OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

Dear OPSAWG members,

this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.html

ending on Thursday, May 2nd.

As a reminder, this I-D summarizes how the term "Operations, 
Administration, and Maintenance" (OAM) is used currently & historically 
in the IETF and intends to consolidate unambiguous and protocol agnostic 
terminology for OAM. The summary includes descriptions of narrower 
semantics introduced by added qualifications the term OAM and a list of 
common capabilities that can be found in nodes processing OAM packets.

The chairs acknowledge a positive poll result at IETF119, but there has 
not been much discussion on the list yet. We would like to gather 
feedback from the WG if there is interest to further contribute and 
review. As a potential enabler for discussions, this call will last 
three weeks.

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments 
you may have.


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to