Dear OPSAWG, I support the adoption of this draft. I think centralising the different used terms in one doc is useful.
Regards, Alex > On 10 Apr 2024, at 20:05, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> wrote: > > Dear OPSAWG members, > > this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of > >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.html > > ending on Thursday, May 2nd. > > As a reminder, this I-D summarizes how the term "Operations, Administration, > and Maintenance" (OAM) is used currently & historically in the IETF and > intends to consolidate unambiguous and protocol agnostic terminology for OAM. > The summary includes descriptions of narrower semantics introduced by added > qualifications the term OAM and a list of common capabilities that can be > found in nodes processing OAM packets. > > The chairs acknowledge a positive poll result at IETF119, but there has not > been much discussion on the list yet. We would like to gather feedback from > the WG if there is interest to further contribute and review. As a potential > enabler for discussions, this call will last three weeks. > > Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you > may have. > > > For the OPSAWG co-chairs, > > Henk > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
