I  received the following message from my Medicare intermediary. I had asked
them about Joe's observation (quoted below). Joe is correct!!!

J> Ron,

J> For  many services/procedures (unless there's national guidelines), it is
J> up  to  the Carrier and/or Intermediary on coverage and how to administer
J> the   Medicare   contract.   Therefore,   it   is   possible   that  some
J> services/procedures  are  covered  in one part of the country and not the
J> other.  It  is  unclear  as  to  why this Carrier chose to not allow this
J> service  (97003)  in  this place of service (ALF); however, effective for
J> claims  processed on or after 3/23/04, this service is allowed in an ALF.
J> I hope this information is helpful. Thanks, Diane


=================================================================

On Tuesday, March 30, 2004, you wrote:

J> Hi Ron:

J> I do apologize for the late post but yes...way to go, congratulations!!!!

J> I believe that it was probably an LMRP issue with your local intermediary/
J> carrier. I have always been reimbursed for my evals in ALFs. My intermediary
J> is Adminastar / carrier is PGBA. With your work, states that are similarly
J> effected as yours must seek a revision of the LMRP to allow 97003. I did
J> face this problem with some private insurance (can't recall which one). They
J> covered other codes but not an OT eval. I stayed quite because I got the
J> rest paid and didn't want the hassle. But next time I will not give in.




_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, visit: http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com

The OTnow Mail Archive: 
www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===============================================

Reply via email to