On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:58:42AM -0500, Bob Harris wrote: > Oskar: I don't think you realize that your use of the word "small > world" is quite different from everyone else's and the graph > theoretic definition. If you think CAN defines a small world in any > sense, we will not be able to communicate.
Oskar and I seem to be using the same definition of "small world network", the same definition put forth by Watts and Strogatz when they defined the term, also the same as the definition given in Wikipedia, as well as in several books and peer-reviewed publications devoted to the topic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-world_network Watts, D. J. and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks". Nature 393:440-42. http://tam.cornell.edu/SS_nature_smallworld.pdf -- Daniel Stutzbach Computer Science Ph.D Student http://www.barsoom.org/~agthorr University of Oregon _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@zgp.org http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences: http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
