On Tue, 14 May 2002, Stephen Adkins wrote:
> We are not deterred. The P5EE bandwagon rolls on. here i am! > In preparation for a vote, I am requesting input from > *everyone* on this list who engages in web application > development or anything approximating "enterprise" > development. I have all the requirements :) > 1. Do you know enough about P5EEx::Blue to vote for it > to become the P5EE code base? If not, what more do > you need to know? What are the attributes of a code > base that would cause you to vote for it to be the > P5EE code base? I don't know enough about your work; i should take a deeper look at your code, but at the moment money for food has the highest priority. I was searching something like your work, and also doing something like that in my spare time (but w/ different approach and less features). > 2. If a P5EE code base exists, will you use it? > What would it need to do for you in order for you to > use it? Yes, but i need time to understand the whole thing. Is there somewhere in your documentation a complete documented example? I would be very pleased to read something and contribute images where needed. > I believe it is ready to be called P5EE-0.1. IMHO +1 > * separates user interface logic (templates and widgets), > business logic (entity widgets), and data access > (repositories) Last time i looked at your demo, i stopped understanding the code at widgets; a quick question: are templates also applicable to widgets? or should i live forever with the same look'n'feel? Repositories are really interesting things, but i couldn't understand if they are only for databases. Ciao, Valerio Valerio Paolini, <http://130.136.3.200/~paolini> -------------------------------------------------- "So, they're attacking John Q. Public for giving copies of Windows to his friends, and all the while they've been _selling_ copies of other peoples' stuff?" - James Jensen
