Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this document as a co-author. The mechanism is
concise but useful to meet practical requirements of segment routing with ECMP,
especially used in the case of inter-domain SR policy.
Regards,
PSF
Original
From: DhruvDhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>
To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>;
Cc: pce-chairs
<pce-cha...@ietf.org>;draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
<draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年01月27日 00:50
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
Please respond by Monday 12th Feb 2024.
Please be more vocal during WG polls!
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
