Hi WG,
Thanks for the review, suggestions and comments from Andrew Stone, Xuesong Geng,
Ran Chen, Gyan Mishra and Weiqiang Cheng. Much appreciated!
I have updated a new version and try to resolve all the comments based on the
mailing list.
Hope this version would be better for you.Thanks!
A new version of Internet-Draft draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-11.txthas
been successfully submitted by Quan Xiong and posted to theIETF
repository.Name: draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-positionRevision: 11Title:
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for SR-MPLS
Entropy Label PositionsDate: 2024-02-06Group: pcePages: 10URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-11.txtStatus:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position/HTML:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-11.htmlHTMLized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-positionDiff:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-11
Best Regards,
Quan
Original
From: DhruvDhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>
To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>;
Cc: pce-chairs
<pce-cha...@ietf.org>;draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
<draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年01月27日 00:50
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
Please respond by Monday 12th Feb 2024.
Please be more vocal during WG polls!
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
