Thanks Rob,

Ari's suggestion in this thread makes sense to me (
https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/message/35813041/ ).  If PDL and
Math::GSL passed their own error handlers then the behaviour in such cases
could be more perlish.


Regards,
Shawn.




On 29 April 2017 at 17:20, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> From: Shawn Laffan
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 11:29 AM
> To: perldl
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL "bitrot-fix" update
>
> ...and on further checking, the crash is not unique to PDL.  See below.
>>
>> Checking every piddle for valid data before passing them on to GSL would
>> be a major slow down, so perhaps a note in the docs would be useful. Unless
>> this is misbehaviour by Math::GSL, of course.
>>
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> The error comes straight from the GSL library.
> The PDL code accesses the GSL library directly - not via Math::GSL (which
> is not a prerequisite for PDL support of the GSL functions).
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Reply via email to