Yes - Ari's suggestion makes good sense to me, too. Cheers, Rob
From: Shawn Laffan Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 7:04 PM To: [email protected] Cc: perldl Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL "bitrot-fix" update Thanks Rob, Ari's suggestion in this thread makes sense to me ( https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/message/35813041/ ). If PDL and Math::GSL passed their own error handlers then the behaviour in such cases could be more perlish. Regards, Shawn. On 29 April 2017 at 17:20, <[email protected]> wrote: From: Shawn Laffan Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 11:29 AM To: perldl Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] PDL "bitrot-fix" update ...and on further checking, the crash is not unique to PDL. See below. Checking every piddle for valid data before passing them on to GSL would be a major slow down, so perhaps a note in the docs would be useful. Unless this is misbehaviour by Math::GSL, of course. Hi Shawn, The error comes straight from the GSL library. The PDL code accesses the GSL library directly - not via Math::GSL (which is not a prerequisite for PDL support of the GSL functions). Cheers, Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
