Right Arthur. Offcource if you sue a tele lens, the caera meter will often do a better job. I once saw a broadcast about a project, where street children were photographing with a K1000 and an incident light meter. The shots were brilliant. Since then I usen my Lunasix a lot. Regards Jens -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Artur Ledóchowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. marts 2003 10:03 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: WHY PENTAX? WAS: Re: Pentax <--> Canon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: WHY PENTAX? WAS: Re: Pentax <--> Canon These days I carry an ambient > light meter with me at all times. That's not because Pentax can't meter > accurately. That's because no reflective light meter will be as accurate as > an ambient light meter. Absolutely! This is what I'm going to do in the nearest future - get an incident light meter, exactly due to the reason you've stated. Actually I must say, that I tend to use matrix metering less and less. I prefer to use spot metering+ML button (with my Z-1p) and I'm perfectly happy when using the SuperA with its c/w metering. But the incident light meter allows me to maintain total control over exposure and its readings are incomparably more accurate... Regards Artur
