Jim Apilado wrote:
Too bad. An owner of a processing lab suggested getting a special card that uses a gray card and a white card. You will get better color if you white balance first. You and your photo friends should really check into this. There was a time when carrying a gray card to meter on was the photo thing to do. Read somewhere once about a card that had all the color spectrum that you took a picture of before shooting your color shots. This would help the film processor in getting the correct color balance.
Jim A.
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:28:30 -0400 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: *istD vs. Digital Rebel Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:24:59 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Apilado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: *istD vs. Digital Rebel
I wonder how many users of digital equipment carry a white card to do white balancing?
No one that I know.
I actually went to a digital seminar thingie a while back which was basically a front for this guy to sell his *really* white white-card. He claimed you couldn't do "proper" photography without one. I was with a bunch of photographer friends, and we just sniggered. All of us use auto.
Just like how many digital slr users carry a light meter around with them all the time so they can get more accurate metering that their dslr doesn't seemingly give them.
Right. The histogram is so innacurate.
Lots of extra stuff to carry.
Whatever.
tv
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
