Its piss poor, I feel ripped off, I wish I could return it and go back to PS7 which was the best program I owned. Maybe it's because I've never had trouble with the Adobe Software I use, like Illustrator, and Photoshop, but I feel PS CS is overpriced bloatware. when you get down to it, 750 dollars new, compared to the free GIMP, and no matter what your reasons, it almost seems delusional to use PS CS at all... Therefore, in my estimation, PS CS better run like a finely tuned race car for the money spent. Not to mention the hoards of sub 100 dollar packages that are gaining on Adobe with each new release. It's only a matter of time before Adobe gets forced out of the market at this rate. Half the "tools" Adobe includes in their software border on utterly useless too.
-Shawn -----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Photoshop CS On May 16, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> > > As Shawn K said: "its just bad design. And for the money it costs it > shouldn't be that badly designed." > I can't see where it's bad design. it runs great on my computer, and the RAW converter is awesome. It's the best thing that ever happened to digital photography. I see no slowdown compared to PS 6, although I never ran PS 7. I'm running it on a Mac G4, dual processor 1.25 gigahertz. I can't imagine how well it must run on a G5, 2 gigahertz. (Okay, I can imagine, but I can't afford it right now.) Paul
