Hello
I was thinking about the MZ-S and I realize something :
The MZ-S is perfectly good for the user who knows what he is going to get...
>From my experience, we usually do not use all function of a SLR.
I know that I feel needed sometimes with my MZ-3., so the MZ-S is a good SLR
if I wish to replace my MZ-3.
As often, there is much asked things which are not very usefull. The MZ-S is
a Pentax version of a SLR which you can easily use. (as easy as a MZ-3)
Of course, I am still wishing a better SLR, but I forget to mention that it
is a good SLR if we know all our needs so we cannot buy it wrongly.
Hoping for a new body for myself, but hoping a MZ-S for Pentax users who
need it !
See you

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to