> > Antonio wrote: > > >Not to mention the poor quality of those digital prints. > > Here I must disagree. A properly printed digital print is equal in quality > to an average film print, up to 8x10 at least. Above 8x10 and for severe > crops I'll agree with you. Our Frontier 375 minilab does a surprisingly > good job on Fuji Crystal Archive paper. > > Bill
A few years ago many of the best 16x20 and 20x30 prints were digitally produced on a lighjet printer (205ppi R/G/B lasers on photographic paper). I don't know what the current state of the art is, but I'd expect there to be something even better by now.
