Well English happens to be my first language so you are in luck. Nice
to see you expand on what you said to include the meaning you intended.
As it was before it distinctly looked like you were saying that digital
outnumbred film in your part of the world.
"a.
On 19 Jul 2004, at 18:17, William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is
Dying?
Whats to re-read. You say that film outnumbers digital in your part
of
the world, I say that film outnumbers digital in my part of the
world.
Not exactly rocket science. Or was I supposed to read your post
backwards or something to find the hidden meaningÇ
Sorry, I forget that English isn't the first language of many of the
people on the list.
What I said is that every day, more people are using digital (than
the day before), and fewer are using film (than the day before), not
that more people are using digital than film.
I am pretty sure that film use is still greater than digital, but
those numbers are shifting inexorably towards digital, and away from
film.
I will try to be clearer in the future.
William Robb
Wish what you like, But daily, there are more people using
digital
cameras, and fewer using film.
