..well, since that easter we never really saw him again. And he didn't even have a camera :-)
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. januar 2005 05:22 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: More Enablement was[Re: Enablement A Go-Go!!] If Christ could be resurrected, film can be as well. Long live Our Lady of Perpetual Tri-X Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > That explains it. The notion that digital capture and reproduction of > images is superior to film is nothing more than a belief system > unsupported by empirical evidence. That fits most definitions of > religion that I know of. All you need is a diety (although I've heard > of some silly people calling atheism a religion - which it clearly > isn't - and they don't have a diety, do they?). > > cheers, > frank > > ps: I'm joking, so please, no frantic posts telling me how inferior > film is to digital and how digital is killing film and how film is > dying. I know all that stuff. I was merely making a funny..
