My Question: >> >> Specifically, I asked about how many more camera body sales >> Pentax might have lost by not including full K/M compatibility. >> I also asked for estimates of the costs related to adding the >> capability. Let me clarify my question and ask you for an >> estimate of how many camera body sales (of any model) Pentax >> might have lost (or may lose in the future) by including only >> partial K/M compatibility across their entire DSLR line. Care >> to publish some estimates?
>"J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded: > > no way, that would take TONS of reasearch of something I don't > need to know. Even for a wild guess? You talk of "millions of lenses" in other posts, but you won't guess whether Pentax might lose "hundreds of sales" or "thousands of sales" or "tens of thousands of sales"? Without some kind of order of magnitude estimate like this, it is very hard to make a case from a business perspective for choosing between partial and full K/M compatibility. That's fine, but it does limit your argument. --Mark
