>I'd use a scanning service and pay a trained, experienced scanner >operator to scan my slides for me. They'd do a better job than I >would, and realistically it'd cost much less in the long run
I got tired of paying ever increasing prices for scans and bought a top end Nikon scanner a few years ago. I get great scans by just pushing the button. I don't think commercial operations can give me a better quality scan. YMMV Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film? On Sep 27, 2005, at 4:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Yes, a high end scanner like the Imacon does a better job. If I > could afford one, I'd buy it. If I had the money for an Imacon or a decent drum scanner, I still wouldn't buy one. I'd use a scanning service and pay a trained, experienced scanner operator to scan my slides for me. They'd do a better job than I would, and realistically it'd cost much less in the long run as I don't think many of my photos would truly justify that kind of treatment. - Dave ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
