You're correct. An A lens will give you full functionality, minus autofocus. 
The FA 35/2 is a superb lens, and I believe the A version is optically 
identical. 
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Inet Shopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm new - been lurking for a few days. I currently use film-based equipment
> (Canon A1 and Rollei compact point-and-shoot), but am considering going
> digital.
> 
> I shoot mostly landscapes and architecture, and prefer a wide-angle lens. With
> the compact I usually use the wide end (38mm) and with the Canon A1, the lens
> is usually 50/1.4 or 28/2. I also shoot at evening gatherings, and like the 
> low
> light capability of both lenses.
> 
> To be clear, the Canon A1 uses FD lenses, and I'm not willing to use adapters
> to get limited functionality on a DSLR body. I am prepared to buy a couple of
> lenses for the DSLR, but not too many - my funds are limited, not Limited :-)
> 
> Logic and economics suggest a K100D with the 18-55 kit lens plus one A-series
> lens, the 28 or 35 f2 for a "normal" view and low-light use. My understanding
> as a non-Pentax user is that the A-series lens will work properly - aperture
> can be controlled from the body, and there is open-aperture metering.
> Therefore, in choosing an A-series lens and not a "modern" autofocus FA lens, 
> I
> trade off only autofocus for cost savings. Please correct me if I'm wrong!
> 
> There is currently no f2 ultrawide lens, so I can't "get back" my 28/2, but 
> the
> 28/35 in f2 guise would give a 42/53mm normal view and be good for low-light
> conditions. The kit lens is already 18/3.5, so a 20/2.8 seems like overkill 
> for
> a half-stop of light.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1. Cost of 28/2 and 35/2: The A-series 28/2 and 35/2 actually seem uncommon 
> and
> somewhat expensive, about US$150+/- on eBay. One A35/2 recently sold for
> US$375! I've also searched the German and Dutch eBay sites, plus KEH. I'm
> clearly not alone in wanting to use them on a Pentax DSLR. Are there any other
> useful sources? I live in Singapore, and the local used market is mostly
> Canon/Nikon.
> 
> 2. K/M Lenses: If I was to use a K/M lens, but only used it wide open in
> aperture priority mode, do I get fully automatic operation i.e. no need for 
> the
> 2-step meter-shoot kludge? If so, then as a "night lens" there's no difference
> between the A and K/M lenses, right?
> 
> 3. Focus Trap: Some posters mentioned that the shutter locks until the camera
> confirms focus. This is great for macrophotography, but can it be turned off?
> Sometimes, an out-of-focus picture beats no picture at all. I've used a Nikon
> D70 to cover an event before - when it couldn't focus, I had to switch to
> manual focus to get the shutter to trip.
> 
> 4. Other general-purpose lenses: Two alternatives to the 18-55/3.5-5.6 kit 
> lens
> are the 17-28/2.8-4 lenses offered by Tamron and Sigma. While a little wider
> and a little faster, they are full-frame lenses and so twice the size and
> weight of the kit lens. Are they worth the extra money and weight? Money can
> slowly be earned again, but I am unlikely to carry and use a lens that is too
> heavy, and full-frame is no advantage since I have no full-frame Pentax body.
> 
> 5. Flash compatibility: I understand the K100D uses a new type of flash
> control, P-TTL, and will not work with normal TTL flashes. I have no idea what
> P-TTL is. I use a Sunpak 30DX bounce/swivel automatic flash with a Canon 
> module
> for my A1. I set the desired aperture on the flash, set the A1 to shutter
> priority at 1/60, and get satisfactory results. If I simply purchase a Pentax
> module (for the LX, ME, MG, MV, MV1), can I continue to shoot in the same way
> i.e. the flash sensor controls the cut-off? I'm not hung up on getting
> TTL/P-TTL flash.
> 
> Finally, Pentax and Sony are currently the only way to get antishake AND a f2
> or faster lens together, as the Canon and Nikon IS/VR lenses are f2.8 at most,
> not to mention heavy and expensive. But Canon and Nikon have the clear edge in
> availability of used lenses and accessories, so I'd also like to hear from
> members who use gear on the Canon and Nikon platforms. Please reply off-list 
> if
> you feel it's not relevant to PDML.
> 
> Thanks in advance, and sorry for the long post,
> Benjamin
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to