I can't comment on the K10D & DA 50-200 combination, but I suspect the DA* lenses are going to cost quite a bit more than the price of the K10D. My guess for the DA* 60-250 f4, at least 2-3 times the cost of the K10D.
Cheers, Dave On 1/6/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm debating with myself. > I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF > tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use. > > The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250. > In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, but I can't > afford both at the same time. > > I'm thinking six-seven months ahead. Then I'll be going to a soccer > tournament. Last year I tried shooting with MF. The keepers rate was low, to > low for my needs. So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use > it on my DS. Or do I by a K10 and DA 50-200 combo, and the DA* later? > > The soccer tournament is for kids. So the game is pretty hard to predict. In > other words, I will need speedy AF performance. So one of the things I'm > wondering about is the AF performance of K10/50-200. Anybody got some > insights on this? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
