I can't comment on the K10D & DA 50-200 combination, but I suspect the
DA* lenses are going to cost quite a bit more than the price of the
K10D. My guess for the DA* 60-250 f4, at least 2-3 times the cost of
the K10D.

Cheers,

Dave

On 1/6/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm debating with myself.
> I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF
> tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use.
>
> The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250.
> In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, but I can't
> afford both at the same time.
>
> I'm thinking six-seven months ahead. Then I'll be going to a soccer
> tournament. Last year I tried shooting with MF. The keepers rate was low, to
> low for my needs. So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use
> it on my DS. Or do I by a K10 and DA 50-200 combo, and the DA* later?
>
> The soccer tournament is for kids. So the game is pretty hard to predict. In
> other words, I will need speedy AF performance. So one of the things I'm
> wondering about is the AF performance of K10/50-200. Anybody got some
> insights on this?

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to