I only played a bit with this combo as I only got my K10D yesterday but AF is at least quite a bit beter than on my ist-D.
I play a bit with it tonight in interior and I let you know if I come to any conclusion. 2007/1/5, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm debating with myself. > I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF > tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use. > > The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250. > In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, but I can't > afford both at the same time. > > I'm thinking six-seven months ahead. Then I'll be going to a soccer > tournament. Last year I tried shooting with MF. The keepers rate was low, to > low for my needs. So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use > it on my DS. Or do I by a K10 and DA 50-200 combo, and the DA* later? > > The soccer tournament is for kids. So the game is pretty hard to predict. In > other words, I will need speedy AF performance. So one of the things I'm > wondering about is the AF performance of K10/50-200. Anybody got some > insights on this? > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
