I think (and hope) that's a bit of an overestimate.
I'd guess that 2x the (current) price of the K10D is
the upper end of the price range, and it may even end
up just a little cheaper than that.  After all, the
FA* 80-200/f2.8 (with a larger front element than a
60-250/f4) didn't cost that much.


On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:12:38AM +0900, David Savage wrote:
> I can't comment on the K10D & DA 50-200 combination, but I suspect the
> DA* lenses are going to cost quite a bit more than the price of the
> K10D. My guess for the DA* 60-250 f4, at least 2-3 times the cost of
> the K10D.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave
> 
> On 1/6/07, Tim ?sleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm debating with myself.
> > I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF
> > tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use.
> >
> > The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250.
> > In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, but I can't
> > afford both at the same time.
> >
> > I'm thinking six-seven months ahead. Then I'll be going to a soccer
> > tournament. Last year I tried shooting with MF. The keepers rate was low, to
> > low for my needs. So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use
> > it on my DS. Or do I by a K10 and DA 50-200 combo, and the DA* later?
> >
> > The soccer tournament is for kids. So the game is pretty hard to predict. In
> > other words, I will need speedy AF performance. So one of the things I'm
> > wondering about is the AF performance of K10/50-200. Anybody got some
> > insights on this?
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to