> Dan Scott wrote: > > > > I realize this is a Mafud/Robb wrestling match, but what would be simplist > > thing for most people in the same situation to do? Scanning negatives or > > slides would be the optimal, but time consuming for large numbers of images. > > A flatbed for prints? Still pretty time consuming, right? Would the quickest > > way be a digital camera? I know some, like the Nikon Coolpics have slide > > attachments available, and a simple tripod would work for quickly shooting > > prints, right?
Personally, if I had a large number that I wanted to archive I would take prints, negatives and slides to a lab and pay to get them scanned to some Photo CD or even regular CD. Time is money. Tom C. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
