Fascinating indeed. Although I have a fair deal of Soviet background
instilled in me, this still strikes me as a rather stupid thing to do.
Suppose that in 20 years from now, it will be proven that smoking is
extremely healthy for some reason. Say, those who smoke are better
endowed to survive the atomics...
Does it mean that all such images will be re-planted with proper smoking
devices???
Boris
Anthony Farr wrote:
Perhaps it's not OT regarding photography, but there's no Pentax content:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/thank_you_for_smoking.html
http://tinyurl.com/4qun6c
I hate revisionist history, even if old practices are now officially frowned
upon. If the picture was no good in its original form then they shouldn't
have used it at all.
regards, Anthony Farr
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
