On Jul 23, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > It would have been good if he'd mentioned that when he asked the > question. It would have made the answer almost instantaneous. This is > what happens when you are providing support and people are using > non-standard bits in place of the normal ways of doing things: it > slows down the ability to help.
You've opened my eyes to possibilities with Finder I didn't know about, that if I'd known about I might not have gone looking for a replacement. Also my mind to the possibility that it's far more versatile than I realized. That said, I find it interesting that it's been extremely easy for me to discover and use Path Finder's features, whereas with Finder they remained hidden. I don't know if there's a manual for Path Finder, if there is I never read it. Have hardly ever even used help. And I think I posted to its support forum only once. I agree Path Finder may be cluttered up with features that few use. With a little instruction I might even come to prefer Finder's more zen-like approach compared to Path Finder's clutter. But I would need some instruction to get me started. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
