On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Steven Desjardins <drd1...@gmail.com> wrote: > The funny thing would be if they > didn't correct there would no evidence of it in this data but rather > in inconsistent exposure results between lenses.
I guess I should have prefaced my comments as coming from one who really likes to use old legacy glass on my K-x (and before that K200D). Frankly, I'm not a DA buyer, so their current offerings are irrelevant to me. I'm interested in m42 Takumars and SMC K-mounts, and (to a far lesser degree) F and FA lenses designed for full-frame 35mm. And if you hang around in those circles that is EXACTLY what you hear about from some people. I've just never paid attention to the CAMERA BODIES that the complainers were using before. I'd really love to hear the Pentax Position on these issues. I think that most users would rather have the camera cheat the ISO in favor of proper exposure with a given lens, rather than force the photographer to keep track of the myriad exposure characteristics of each lens (which would change depending on the aperture you were using them with). Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
