On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Thibouille wrote: > My take on this is the following: > ... snip ...
> With reviews as they are done now (good or bad) the fact that some > cameras (yes, Nikon being one of them but Pentax might be as well) > display (always) Iso6400 but use Iso5000 is nothing but a lie. > Of course the review favors the Nikon because High Isos are better. Uh... > Strangely the accuracy of displayed values are almost NEVER tested. > > Same goes for max shutter speed. The rule was (I dunno how it is in > digital age, really) that the the max shutter speed has the interest > to garantee the the second one is indeed accurate. > Even 10-15 years ago, Penatx cameras has a 1/100 flash sync which was > accurate. Most competing Canikon cameras has a 1/125 sync but they all > were in fact 1/100. > > Those are bold lies and should be presented as such. First you want honesty in advertising? What next? Honesty in politics? Politeness on mailing lists? A Pentax with decent autofocus? -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
