On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Thibouille <pentaxl...@gmail.com> wrote: > First I should have placed a smilie at the end 'cos my comment was > partly tong in cheek (but partly only). > Second, you're both right and wrong. > > As for Video/flash there's I think not even a question the Canon is better. > > For AF it is too early. Guessing is guessing and should not be found > in a sentence stating (unverified) things. Do I expect the AF to be as > good as best Canon AF? No, but it may well beat 5DII AF (which isn't > the best but is no slouch either).
I'd expect the K-5 would beat the 5DmII, which is a poor AF performer by Canon standards (and shares its basic AF unit with the Rebels, not the better bodies), the 7D is another story, like the Nikon D300(s) the 7D's AF performance rivals the true pro bodies. > > As for Mpix, I'm sorry but this is laughable seeing the little > difference. Or why would Nikon guys pay for D700/D3s 'crappy' little > 12Mpix sensor. > As for DR, the 7D is bye bye. Oh, D700 is also. Damn. And that 60D > is... well almost a toy. > K5 sealing is better, fps is almost tie (7fps vs 8 fps), High ISOs are > better on K5. The 2MP thing was a little tongue in cheek, Canon's 18MP sensor is not terribly good and can't outresolve a 12MP sensor at higher ISO's. > > If that's no tie (based on known facts) I dunno what it is. Each has > good (and crap) pieces. > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
