Bill, I agree with John. It's a nice image and I prefer it to the truck/kiss. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:39 AM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > From: Ann Sanfedele >> >> On 7/19/2011 09:52, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>> William's shot is a nice image, but it appears to me that it was taken >>> in a museum, under fluorescent lights with a wallpaper background. >> >> It >>> >>> that IS where it is taken (or something similar), then this is >>> understandable and a nice representation of what was there. If it >>> wasn't taken there and was an outdoors illuminated shot in nature, >>> then I think the tone/color balance/tone mapping probably >>> misrepresents the original scene in a rather unsatisfying way. >>> >>> Darren Addy >>> Kearney, Nebraska >>> >> Thats interesting... THe more I look at it.. >> (and I'm reinserting it's link here) >> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/hdrshroom.html >> >> the more I realise that what bothers me is that background.. like the >> studio paper that seems to be popular in some portrait photo studios. >> Maybe that, as much as the rendering, makes it look so false.. >> >> ann > > I thought that was just a reflection of the sky in water; that this was > taken on the edge of a pond somewhere. I do wonder if the mushroom is real > or if it's a garden sculpture? > > In either case, I find it much more appealing than the over-processed truck > image. Bill created a nice image without going over-board. > > My opinion, YMMV. > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3773 - Release Date: 07/18/11 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
