Ill second that. IF they come out with a top line FF body, they should uncripple the lensmount at the same time to enable the full power of their superb vintage FF lenses.
----------------- J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net ----------------- -----Original Message----- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 11:26 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The last Photokina speculation thread on PDML before Photokina P.J., I don't want to get into a fight about this. I won't consider Pentax the KBC (King of Backwards Compatibility) until they uncripple their mount (either physically or through software). They could do it but, like Seinfeld, choose not to. When companies act this way it pisses me off. I've been told that it's because Pentax doesn't want me using my M mount glass, they want me to buy new lenses. I would be fine with this statement (I do understand good business practice) if we had a thorough DA lens line up, but I own a few non-A mount lenses that Pentax doesn't make in DA mount, and I have to use them with the green button or wide open. Just *my* opinion, mind you; I'm not trying to convince anyone. Cheers, -M. \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 8 September 2012 20:55, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/7/2012 3:07 PM, Miserere wrote: >> >> On 7 September 2012 14:13, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 9/7/2012 9:00 PM, Miserere wrote: >>>> >>>> Boris, >>>> >>>> It would be for a mirrorless camera, so it wouldn't be a retrofocus >>>> design (thus the rear element protruding into the "mirror" box. >>>> >>>> >>>> -M. >>> >>> >>> Oh, I don't expect Pentax a.k.a. king of backward compatibility to >>> produce >>> K-01-only lens. That is something that can be imagined, but can probably >>> not >>> be imagined to come true, you know. >> >> I'd say Pentax is the *Queen* of compatibility; Nikon is the King. But >> yes, most things related to Pentax are hard to imagine, even if they >> do actually happen. > > > You forget that Nikon built an entire series of lenses that would cause > damage to either the lens, camera or both it mounted on the wrong series > camera body. The only time Pentax even came close to that was back in the > screw mount era, (pre-Spotmatic), and even then it was only one lens IIRC. > Sure the aperture simulator is gone but at least no Pentax produced K mount > lens will damage any Pentax manufactured K mount body or vice versa. > > >> >> -M. >> >> \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com >> >> http://EnticingTheLight.com >> A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthly search. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.