The L is better for lenses with the recessed rear element. But the S is also a very good optic and is the only conveyer that will work with lenses that don't have a deeply recessed rear element. I believe the A 300-4 requires the S version, as does the A400-5.6. Paul
On Oct 28, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I had a FA* 300 f/2.8 which had a "recessed" rear lens and, therefore, would > accommodate the 1.4L T/C. I understood that the "L" was the better of the > T/C's. (?) > > Jack > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: J.C. O'Connell <hifis...@gate.net> > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' <pdml@pdml.net> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 5:22 AM > Subject: Best 2x teleconvertor for smc pentax-a* 300/4 > > I want to get a good 2x TC for my pentax a* 300/4 lens. > Anybody know which model is the best (2x-L?) or maybe > a non pentax model? thanks in advance... > > ----------------- > J.C.O'Connell > hifis...@gate.net > ----------------- > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
