On Thu, Aug 08, 2013, steve harley wrote: > on 2013-08-08 9:33 Aahz Maruch wrote >> >>I did have the 16-50 in my case, but it was drizzling at the start, and >>partway through the walk I decided to just make it a one-lens exercise. >>(Sure was glad to have WR lens!) > > did you mean DA 16-45? DA* 16-50 is sealed, even though it doesn't > have "WR" in the name
Absolutely! I used it in a light rain a few days earlier. But the camera is *NOT* sealed while you're changing lenses... (Perhaps I was being a bit overcautious, but I'm not always sure-fingered and this was a rental camera/lens.) Side note: that light rain with the 16-50 taught me another reason why really it's a Good Idea to use a lens hood. Lens spots in those pics are fortunately not toooo visible (and lend a bit of atmosphere to some). -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
