As Louis CK says, "Everything is amazing, and nobody's happy."

http://www.thatvideosite.com/v/94

-c




On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:47:40AM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
>> I agree entirely Bipin. I don't think there is a single thing that is
>> different from the K-30 to the K-50 outside of the change in body
>> shape. That the buttons on the back are all in the same exact place
>> tells me that the K-50 is just a K-30 in sheep's clothing. I think its
>> great that Pentax at least decided to offer some enticing features on
>> their entry level models, but you know, even something as simple as a
>> tilting LCD would have made a new camera at least *seem* worthwhile.
>> Honestly I don't know what's going on with Pentax/Ricoh currently. I
>> see a lot of wheel spinning but no real progress.
>
> How many times have you heard or given the advice that one of the
> most important characteristics of a camera is how it fits in your hand?
>
> I could see how changing the body of a camera could make a huge difference.
> If I had not been on the cusp of getting a K-5, the different shape of the
> body would have been a major incentive for me to upgrade from the K-x to the
> K-r (or since it's still talk like a pirate day, the K-arrrr). By the same
> token, I could see how a re-spin of the K-01 that wasn't butt ugly could
> be a good thing (though I'll admit that it felt surprisingly good in my 
> hands).
>
> If the flagship camera were still the K-20, or even the K-7, and
> they were just spinning new versions with no major improvements, I'd
> be seriously looking at a D7100 about now.  However, there are very few
> pictures that I'm missing with the K-5 II, that I'd be able to capture
> with any camera that costs less than two or three times as much. There
> are probably shots that some other $800, or even $1600 camera body out
> there can get that the K-5 II can't, but I haven't run across them. Mind
> you, I would love for Pentax to come out with a new body that would
> compell me to upgrade, because in order to do so, would mean that it
> was infuckingcredibly amazing.
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen                  l...@red4est.com         http://red4est.com/lrc
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to